STATE OF NEW MEXICO
COUNTY OF BERNALILLO
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
No. DM-12-610 rel. DV-12-234
BARRIE
LEE DERRINGER
Petitioner,
v.
DAVID BRIAN DERRINGER
Respondent,
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID
DERRINGER
STATE OF NEW MEXICO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF BERNALILLO )
David
Derringer, being first duly sworn, deposes and states as follows:
1.
I, David Derringer was the lawful husband of
Barrie Derringer from January 15, 2010 or is until the possibility of the still
not finalized action of an unlawful “bifurcated divorce” on April 10, 2012, still
on appeal, and wherein David Derringer had no knowing connection of Alisa
Hadfield with the marriage or personal life of Barrie and David Derringer, but
wherein Judge Hadfield acted on June 17, 2013 in opinion in an order to lead
any rational person to believe a previous interference with the Derringer
marriage by “Judge Hadfield’s opinions and personal statements” (unsustained by
either jurisdiction or legal availability) of personal actions, thoughts and
decisions made by husband David Derringer and wife Barrie Derringer on February
4, 2012, wherein there was no legal case before Judge Hadfield until February
8, 2012.
2.
On February 4, 2012 Barrie Derringer, (with
previous bipolar, depression and suicidal tendencies diagnosed and under the
care of a doctor with attending medications for such), disregarded husband
David Derringer’s attempts to properly lock Barrie Derringer from a
storage/shop after Barrie’s PTSD syndromes exhibited in January, 2012 after a
home fire that killed 5 pets on December 23, 2011; a unit that contained loaded
firearms, so as to assure and protect wife Barrie Derringer from death or
physical harm due to her past statements and attempts at suicide in 2010, and wherein
Barrie Derringer, without any notice to her lawful husband, used 12 other
persons to break and enter and actually take some of the loaded firearms until
stopped properly by APD and told to leave, and after the 12 persons did
larceny, assault and battery, vandalism and destruction of property against
David Derringer. Taking the loaded firearms from the storage to allow Barrie
Derringer possession of same, when each and every firearm was the sole and
separate possession personal property of David Derringer were acts by the 12
persons of larceny, and “reckless endangerment” of the wife Barrie Derringer;
acts against the legal attempts at protection by husband David Derringer for
his own wife’s safety and physical health. Alisa Hadfield aka Judge Alisa
Hadfield was not present, had no jurisdiction of any case involving either
David Derringer or Barrie Derringer but now has presented “personal opinions” condoning
the actions of Barrie Derringer’s 12 other persons regarding this date in
history thus intertwining her conspiracy and “reckless endangerment” against
David’s wife at that time, and to suggest an underlying conspiracy involving
Alisa Hadfield with Barrie Derringer and Alain Jackson and corporation Maestas
and Ward at that time. There is circumstantial belief and evidence that Judge
Hadfield was intertwined in bribes, pay-offs or political pressure and
influence to have been underlyingly involved in the criminal and outrageous
incidents of February 4, 2012 as was also attorney Alain Jackson. No case was
before Judge Hadfield until February 8, 2012 involving either David
Derringer or Barrie Derringer.
3.
This affidavit is brought in good faith and not
meant for delay as recusal is extremely necessary as is a full investigation of
the matter involving criminal acts of parties and corporations, with judicial violations
of Oath, Canon and Constitution in deliberate and maliciousness, believed
coupled with likely contributions (bribes) and political pressure and influence
from a multi-million dollar corporation of NAI Maestas and Ward Commercial Real
Estate wherein the Petitioner in this action is the “accountant” of such
corporation without either a CPA or degree but doing highly secretive work of
hidden financial matters that likely encompass illegal activities of money
laundering. In both DV-12-234 and DM-12-610 Judge Hadfield has become aware of
proof of Barrie Derringer’s perjury, fraud, insurance fraud, falsification of
the court record and disregard of the statutory and Constitutional mandates and
performance deficits by Barrie Derringer of the DM-12-610 Order of July 3,
2012, and has protected, ignored and preserved such atrocities against David Derringer
and against all laws, knowingly “facilitating” all acts by Barrie Derringer and
other conspirators involved.
4.
Barrie Derringer has entered into irrational and
criminal acts after leaving husband David Derringer on December 27, 2011 that
are proven by David Derringer that encompass perjury, fraud, falsification of
the court records, and criminal insurance fraud, and David Derringer has both
proof and evidence of severe abuse of Barrie Derringer in the employee of NAI
Maestas and Ward Commercial Real Estate, direct witness to verbal abuse and
denial of US Labor laws against Barrie Derringer by her employer and direct
witness to multiple third parties, including the CEO’s of Maestas and Ward
interfering with the Derringer marriage, which included criminal attack of
David Derringer on February 4, 2012 with assault and battery and conversion and
other related torts, with an underlying belief and evidence to support this
belief that Barrie Derringer is both threatened and controlled by extortion and
exploitation by Masestas and Ward to do secretive “bookkeeping” and accounting
in duplication or differentiation of her job as accountant for Maestas and Ward
that probably encompass illegal activities, and that Barrie Derringer is in a
situation way over her head in which she cannot escape and will not try to
escape or turn in the illegal activities ongoing in her life with connection
with her employer and chose instead to divorce her husband David Derringer.
Barrie Derringer has made many bad decisions, based in intimidation and threats
from very bad persons, and has thus sabotaged the Derringer marriage, David
Derringer and Barrie Derringer and has prevented David Derringer from affecting
any protection of Barrie Derringer in this regard.. Such bad advice and
manipulation also come from attorney Alain
Jackson and Judge Alisa
Hadfield.
5.
It is sustained by proof and personal knowledge
that in all of Barrie Derringer’s life, she was truly the most safe and secure
when in the presence and under the blanket of love and protection of husband
David Derringer.
6.
I am the Respondent in the matters of DM-12-610
and related DV-12-234 in which Judge Alisa Hadfield presides, and activates and
sustains the illegal decisions of the Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar; all
decisions going against Constitution and all laws sworn to God to protect by
both; with both having knowledge that DV-12-234 was brought and continued with
fundamental error of no legal service of summons upon David Derringer.
7.
I know that the illegal decisions and actions in
which Judge Alisa Hadfield presides, and activates and sustains the illegal
decisions of the Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar are intertwined and illegally
ruled against all law to insulate and protect both Barrie Derringer working in
submission, exploitation, and under extortion by a multi-million dollar
corporation of NAI Maestas and Ward Commercial Real Estate who also by provable
circumstances has connections and is gaining underlying support by Judge
Hadfield in attempts to defeat Plaintiff David Derringer in CV-12-1307 and
CV-12-10816 wherein multiple defendants including the CEO’s of Maestas and Ward
did assault and battery, conversion, alienation of affection, interference of a
marriage contract, loss of consortium, conversion (larceny) and other torts
against David Derringer.
8.
Judge Hadfield
made personal slanderous statements against David
Derringer in open court on April 3, 2013 showing animosity and a
provable bias and prejudice against the Respondent.
9.
Judge Hadfield
has stopped the due process and equal protection of the Respondent in all court
testimony under oath, has denied “equal time” of litigation in open court hearings
in comparison to the Petitioner, and has directed the court clerks not to
accept filings specifically of David
Derringer.
10.
Every ruling of Judge Hadfield has been without
reasons or legal authority substantiation and each and every ruling in both DV-12-234
and DM-12-610 has been against David Derringer and against all laws,
Constitution and extreme multiple laws presented by David Derringer that each
fully support every legal contention of the Respondent and make it impossible
for Judge Hadfield to make the rulings she does.
11.
Judge Hadfield
has blocked legal appeals of David
Derringer in an effort to support the
Petitioner and all Defendants in CV-12-1307 and CV-12-10816 in which cases Judge
Hadfield is not the finder of facts.
12.
On June 4, 2013 in DM-12-610, I testified to
doing accidental damages to the 2005 Chevy Silverado in a year and a ½ past, of
one battery being removed as bad and the other remaining battery in need of
normal replacement, and of front bumper plastic damage with plastic fog light damages
and right plastic rear fender damages after hitting a snow bank and tree in
January, 2012, and further damages to the same fender after being also kicked
by a horse a few months later, and David Derringer testified to letting all of
the air from the tires of the vehicle when having to have left it in
Springerville, Arizona unattended due to mechanical failure of a clogged diesel
fuel filter for the owner David Derringer’s own protection of his legal truck
from theft of the possibility of a criminal rolling it onto a trailer for
transport to Mexico as the vehicle being the most stolen type of vehicle in the
United States. David Derringer gave exclusive evidence, coupled with Barrie
Derringer’s own testimony that she has not physically seen the truck since
December 2011, which proved to the court that on April 3, 2013, when David
Derringer was ordered to give legal possession and control to Barrie Derringer
and at all times past there was not “vandalism” of the 2005 Chevy Silverado,
but a normal wear and tear of a “work truck” one ton dually, and that there was
no legal admission of any evidence by Barrie Derringer of claim to any
$8,500.00 bill for restoration of the 2005 Chevy Silverado upon taking legal
possession and that such claim was clearly “criminal insurance fraud”.
13.
I, David Derringer have the ability and
knowledge to have replaced all bumper, fender, batteries and other damages and
normal wear and tear on the 2005 Chevy Silverado with parts and labor not to
exceed $800.00 and has knowledge that the claim to the insurance company of
GEICO was irrational since the repairs could be made for an amount of less than
the deductible of the insurance policy. David
Derringer never claimed or burdened GEICO
insurance with the damages to the vehicle for the reasons stated herein #13.
14.
I, David Derringer was the legal owner, the
party in possession and the party with exclusive knowledge as to the condition
and driveablity of the 2005 Chevy Silverado 4X4 until stolen from him by the
court and Barrie Derringer as of April 3, 2013, and knows with certainty that
the truck would have been running properly again with the purchase and
installation of one diesel fuel filter of cost of approximately $8.00, and that
the other damages to the truck were “previous damages” well before the truck
was left by David Derringer in Springerville, Arizona a week or two before
April 3, 2013.
15.
I, David
Derringer know with certainty that all acts,
replacements and any purchases of new tires or batteries by Barrie Derringer or
others after April 3, 2013
were not valid under any claims of “vandalism” and David
Derringer did no vandalism to the vehicle at
any time. David Derringer knows with certainty that Judge Hadfield has
knowledge with the testimony of David Derringer and Barrie Derringer’s
testimony that she did not see the vehicle since December, 2011 and did not
ever see the vehicle before some shop performed over $8,500.00 worth of
“repairs” to the vehicle after April 3, 2013, that all claims against GEICO
insurance and false claims of inadmissible evidence of a bill of over $8,500.00
constitutes criminal insurance fraud in which with such knowledge and
assistance by attorney Alain Jackson and Judge Hadfield makes both parties to
such criminal insurance fraud. Judge Hadfield
placed the $8,500.00 bill without legal introduction into evidence into the
court record in the Order of June 17,
2013 knowingly to insulate Barrie Derringer, Alain
Jackson and Judge Hadfield
from provable GEICO insurance fraud.
16.
I, David
Derringer am the primary regarding the loan
of the 2005 Chevy Silverado with Wells Fargo Dealer Services. Acct #9070040276
with Judge Hadfield illegally taking the truck, leaving David Derringer liable
and accountable for the entire loan without the possession of the asset, and yet
Barrie Derringer aka Barrie Crowe had no authority to make any claim for
vandalism with GEICO insurance without the consultation of the primary loan
holder David Derringer, co-owner of the vehicle in question. Clearly, David
Derringer has knowledge that any rational adult person would not authorize over
$8,500.00 worth of repairs without seeing the vehicle and despite a no-contact
order by Barrie Derringer against David Derringer it was the duty of
representing attorney Alain Jackson to contact David Derringer to ascertain the
actual condition of the vehicle before any repairs were made, and it is
believed with certainty that Barrie Crowe aka Barrie Derringer, attorney Alain
Jackson and Judge Hadfield directly attempted to set up David Derringer to be
falsely accused of “vandalism” so as to reap monetary rewards at the expense of
the GEICO insurance company. .
17.
I, David Derringer have personal knowledge that
Barrie Derringer had changed her legal name from Barrie Beverley in November,
2009 by a court Order by Judge Clay Campbell and has thus since that time had
no legal ability to use the name Barrie Lee Beverley. David
Derringer has personal knowledge that Barrie
Derringer married David Derringer
on January 15, 2010 making Barrie’s
legal name Barrie Lee Derringer as of that date. David
Derringer has personal knowledge that Barrie
Derringer’s legal name was Barrie Lee Derringer until at least April 10, 2012 when claimed by a
“bifurcated divorce” to have legally become Barrie Lee Crowe, the Crowe being
the maiden name of Barrie.
18.
I, David
Derringer have direct evidence by bills that
Barrie Derringer in January, 2012 filed, petitioned, applied for and was
granted several credit cards under the name Barrie Lee Beverley, constituting
malicious and deliberate “fraud” to lenders and has charged several hundred
dollars to such companies in identity theft and identity fraud.
19.
I, David Derringer have direct knowledge by the
Order of DM-12-610 of July 3, 2012 that Barrie Derringer aka Barrie Crowe was
to maintain current registration and insurance by her payments, on the
Derringer 5-ton military truck, the 1997 Ford PU, and the 2005 Chevy Silverado,
and knows that Barrie defied the court order and did not pay for any
registration on any of the above mentioned vehicles, and did not have any
insurance coverage of the 5-ton military vehicle at any time, and that also
this knowledge of defiance of the Order of the court was known at all times by
Judge Hadfield.
20.
Myself, David Derringer, and Barrie Derringer
properly had the 2005 Chevy Silverado VIN: 1GCJK33235F926944, insured by David
Derringer’s actions with GEICO under policy number 4229771045 with both Barrie
Derringer and David Derringer covered as drivers of the vehicle until May,
2013.
21.
I, David Derringer have direct knowledge that
without consultation with me and without my knowledge, on or about January 5-9th,
2013, Barrie Crowe aka Barrie Derringer, defrauded GEICO insurance to cancel
the Derringer policy number 4229771045 taking David Derringer from such policy
as a legal driver unknown to David Derringer even though David Derringer had
possession and control of the vehicle until verbal court Order of April 3,
2013, and is primary on the loan. By direct knowledge from Wells Fargo Dealer
Services, upon which David Derringer is primary in loan, Barrie Crowe in fraud applied
for and received a new GEICO policy number 4292370568 under the name of Barrie
Lee Derringer, while claiming to be legally Barrie Lee Crowe, and fraudulently
claimed the address of the vehicle to be Box 11373 in Denver, Colorado, clearly
a post office box attended by her sister Michele living 30 miles outside of
Denver, Colorado, but of when the 2005 Chevy vehicle was at all times located
and under license No. LMA-003 of New Mexico,
and maintains such false identity and address also with Wells Fargo Dealer
Services, and that all of this knowledge is in the possession of attorney Alain
Jackson.
22.
I, David Derringer have direct knowledge that
Barrie Derringer was illegally given total possession and control of the 2005
Chevy vehicle on hearing of April 3, 2013 wherein also without any ability of
the primary loan holder’s authorization Barrie Crowe aka Barrie Derringer was
given the right to sell the 2005 Chevy and keep David Derringer from having his
$12,000.00 in sole and separate inheritance funds in the vehicle and was also
given the right to sell the vehicle for any amount Barrie deemed prudent and to
keep ½ of the equity over payoff with also subjecting David Derringer to
illegal judgments granting Barrie even more of the proceeds of the sale, and it
is firmly believed that Barrie Crowe aka Barrie Derringer used that means and
motive to put the 2005 Chevy Silverado in “showroom condition” so as to obtain
as much money as possible upon such sale, and used the criminal means of fraud
of claims of “vandalism” for that end result in defrauding GEICO insurance;
betting on the come of paying only $1,000.00 deductible for obtaining over
$8,500.00 improvements on the vehicle that were previous damages and maintenance,
none having to do with the fraudulent claims of “vandalism”, but which would
likely increase the sale value by over $10,000.00. It is believed that Barrie
purposefully failed and refused to view the vehicle for such repairs beforehand
so as to attempt to insulate herself from any future claims of such fraud, or
intends to take the vehicle to Colorado or elsewhere and disappear with leaving
David Derringer accountable for the loan, as heard in Barrie’s testimony under
Oath on June 4, 2013 that Barrie has not seen the 2005 Chevy Silverado to know
any of its condition since December, 2011; such bad advice believed to have
come from attorney Alain Jackson. David Derringer has personal knowledge that
Judge Hadfield has personal knowledge by testimony of all parties on June 4,
2013 in hearing and thus is party to any act to validate or use the Order of a
court to sustain any repairs or claims of $8,500.00 use of GEICO to insure that
the Chevy 2005 Silverado is in showroom condition at the expense of GEICO, the judge
being thus a party to the insurance fraud.
23.
As the tires were taken from the David Derringer
2005 Chevy Silverado vehicle that were known by me to be in perfect useable
condition of over 70% tread without only sans “air”, those tires are entirely useable
on the David Derringer Ford PU, they are the personal property of David
Derringer and must be returned.
24.
I know by written court Order that Judge
Hadfield has made very personal and pre-meditated “opinions” illegally of court
record on June 17, 2013, that husband David Derringer kept wife Barrie
Derringer from getting all of the collective personal property (both community
and sole property of both parties) on February 4, 2012; a date wherein Alisa
Hadfield was not involved in the exclusive decision making relationship between
the “Derringer’s” husband and wife and wherein “Judge” Alisa Hadfield had no
legal case before her for any possible ‘jurisdiction or judicial capacity’ to
make any personal opinions regarding a time frame in which no legal action had
been filed by Barrie Derringer against David Derringer; but wherein such
“personal opinion” I know shows a conspiracy, collusion, and personal
involvement by either prior communication or advice regarding the criminal
action that took place on February 4, 2012 wherein Barrie Derringer had 12
persons, including two CEO’s of Maestas and Ward assist her in criminal
destruction of the Derringer locks of a storage/shop unit of 101 Florida SE
Unit C in Albuquerque, New Mexico and all engaged in destruction of personal
property, vandalism, larceny of Derringer community property and personal
exclusive property of David Derringer, and as David Derringer arrived to
legally stop the unlawful actions of all present, the 12 persons including
Maestas and Ward CEO’s Debbie and Irwin Harms did criminal assault and battery
against the husband David Derringer of Barrie Derringer and had to be removed
by the Order of the Albuquerque Police Department; the “personal opinion” of
Judge Hadfield on July 17, 2013 meant to insulate, protect and give excuse and
attempted judicial “validation” of the criminal actions of the 12 persons on
February 4, 2012; a date and actions in which Judge Hadfield has no personal witness,
has no possible jurisdiction without any case pending before her at that time
in history, has no jurisdiction and has heard no testimony of all parties
present, is not the finder of facts of the tort law suits regarding same of David Derringer v. Maestas and Ward et
al of CV-12-1307 and CV-12-10816 of which I am the Plaintiff in both
cases; and the only logical reasoning that Judge Hadfield would attempt to
place such “opinion” in the Court record is to support, insulate, defend, and
work in conspiracy with mis-use of power and position to affect the other cases
in obstruction of justice, and to repay favors for compensation from the
multi-million dollar corporation of NAI Maestas and Ward.
25.
I, David Derringer have filed four different
motions for recusal for cause against Judge Hadfield, each illegally decided in
denial by Judge Hadfield herself; has filed four separate complaints against
Judge Hadfield with the NM Judicial Standards Commission; and has filed a
Petition for Writ of Superintending Control with the New Mexico Supreme Court,
but to no avail to stop the public corruption, violations of Oath, Canon and
Constitution by Judge Hadfield.
26.
I am seeking both recusal for cause of both
Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar and Judge Hadfield and I have multiple reasons to
believe and I do emphatically believe that both Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar
and Judge Hadfield are intertwined with bribes, political pressure and
underlying motives of non judicial nature with a personal view and preferred
outcome of the proceedings from before the very start of these proceedings that
mandate not only recusal and a change of venue, but a full law enforcement
investigation and the mandatory investigation required by the Code of Judicial
Conduct Canon 3 (D)(1), and an entire dismissal of DV-12-234 and DM-12-610 with
no divorce granted for Barrie Derringer due to “public corruption”.
27.
I, David Derringer have been subjected to a
deprivation of Constitutional rights under the 1st, 2nd,
4th, 5th, 6th, 13th and 14th
Amendments, and a bias and prejudice from before the initiation of DV-12-234 (a
case of fundamental error of lack of jurisdiction and lack of service of
summons making it entirely defective and yet continued “ad infinitum”) and the case DM-12-610 brought in perjury and
fraud wherein due to extreme bias, prejudice and criminality on the part of the
judiciary against David Derringer both case must be dismissed with prejudice
without any divorce granted for Barrie Derringer, whereas a fair trial was not
had at any time nor could be had under any of these egregious circumstances.
28.
I, David
Derringer know that all acts by Barrie
Derringer, Alain Jackson,
Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar
and Judge Hadfield have been
illegal, brought in bias and prejudice due to an underlying conspiracy with
other third parties and have been deliberately meant to take Constitutional
rights, single out David Derringer
and to persecute David Derringer
relentlessly.
29.
I believe that I cannot have justice in the
venue in which DM-12-610 and DV-12-234
are currently located with the legal indiscretions that have been
performed against the laws by Judge Hadfield and Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar.
30.
I believe fully that I have been the victim of
discrimination and abuse of discretion under my rights to have ability to use
the United States Court
system for redress of torts committed against me in proper due process and
equal protection of the law and all of my Constitutional rights have been
defiled. I have had all of my rights taken from me and the case fully held
against me ongoing, without any service of summons at the onset in a total
fundamental error and lack of jurisdiction in DV-12-234 with Judge Hadfield and
Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar acting well outside of the law in a conspiracy
against rights, obstruction of justice and a deprivation of rights under color
of law against me, in DV-12-234 and that case used with additional acts of
injustice, bias and prejudice in DM-12-610, summarily also using the courts to
inflict upon me larceny, perjury, fraud, and denial of any citizenship in the
United States.
31.
I believe that I have not received proper use of
the court and been subjected to a criminal acts against me of deprivation of my
Constitutional rights under both Commissioner Cosgrove/Aguilar and Judge Alisa
Hadfield for the following reasons:
(1.)
deprivation of statutory rights under both New Mexico
and federal statutes
(2.)
denial of Constitutional rights 1st, 2nd, 4th,
5th, 6th, 13th and 14th Amendments
(3.)
failure and “refusal” to comply with former case laws involving the substantive
matter of the order of protection and dissolution of marriage petition.
(4.)
violation of Oath, Canon and the Code of Judicial Conduct
(5.)
working outside of jurisdiction with use of other cases and other judge’s
opinions to make decisions in the instant case and refusal to allow the higher
courts their exclusive jurisdiction when all matters are on appeal, to instead
continue with cases in a trial court without any jurisdiction or judicial
capacity and illegally turning a civil matter into criminal charges against
David Derringer only in a written order without Miranda rights, without a
jury, without an attorney, without
criminal complaint, without any due process or equal protection.
(6.)
a shown animosity and hatred towards the Respondent with abusive, slanderous, derogatory
and threatening remarks in both open court and in written Orders
(7.)
degradation of the right to state facts and the truth as known by the Respondent
in open court as “muzzled” by the Commissioner and Judge tainting the court
record with only what they allow to be presented or said in only response to
their questions on the witness stand, without ability of the Pro-Se Respondent
to have due process and “opportunity to be heard” with also Judge Hadfield
notifying the court clerks not to file any court pleading or paper from David
Derringer singled out for this prejudice and persecution when Judge Hadfield
has no legal ability to conduct tyranny in such a manner to “control” what is
being filed in the courts as a way to corrupt and peruse the court record before
Judge Hadfield has any legal jurisdiction of the matter until after the
pleading is filed with the clerk. Judge Hadfield circumvents the legal judicial
system to control a party litigant by her misuse of power and abuse of
discretion to see and allow or not allow a court paper to become of court
record before it is filed; an act of sedition, treason and obstruction of
justice as federal criminal acts against David Derringer.
(8.)
a bias and prejudice against the Respondent and fraud used against me for the
Petitioner with stealing David Derringer’s community income, community bank
accounts, community property, sole and separate inheritance and forcing David
Derringer to remain as the primary loan holder on a 2005 Chevy Silverado truck
when giving legal and physical possession to the Petitioner, and refusing to
abide by the testimony showing that David Derringer has over $12,000.00 in that
truck in sole and separate monies, and yet awarding the Petitioner unproven
items missing, while stealing from the Respondent over $55,000.00 worth of
items stolen in larceny from the Derringer storage with no redress. The
Commissioner and Judge Hadfield disregard all NM statutory laws and case laws
that prevent such action, and this is manifested in rulings against New Mexico
laws to protect and insulate Barrie Derringer, Petitioner, including making
sure that the Petitioner is not even held to the standard of compliance with
orders from this court. I know also that Judge Hadfield keeps Barrie Derringer
unaccountable for any payback of the $7,000.00 and $100 per month payments for
two years of my use of sole and separate inheritance funds to recuse my wife
Barrie from pre-marriage IRS debt, even though the Order for Barrie to be
accountable for payment of all pre-marriage debt is in the Final Judgment of
November 15, 2012.
(9.)
A shown distaste and subjugation of pro-se parties in general with manipulation
of the rules and abuse of discretion to out side of the law and outside of
jurisdiction at all times and to rule for the Petitioner with acceptance of the
proven perjury and fraud in use by Barrie Derringer and attorney Alain Jackson
in and out of the courtroom; not at all what the US Congress envisioned a
justice to do while legislating the US Court system.
Further, Affiant
sayeth naught.
____________________________________
David Derringer
SUBSCRIBED AND
SWORN TO before me this _____th day of June, 2013 by David
Derringer.
____________________________________
(Seal) Notary
Public
My commission
expires:_________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment