STATE OF NEW MEXICO
COUNTY OF BERNALILLO
SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
BARRIE LEE DERRINGER, No. DM-12-0610
Petitioner,
v.
DAVID BRIAN DERRINGER,
Respondent,
RESPONDENT’S ANSWER IN DIRECT OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S VERIFIED PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; REQUEST TO DENY AND DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE SAID INSTANT PETITION DM-12-610 FOR CAUSE; AND REQUEST FOR ORDER OF DEFERRAL FOR NO PETITIONS FOR DIVORCE OR SEPARATION BE FILED IN THIS COURT OR ANY OTHER BY PETITIONER FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR
COMES NOW the Respondent David Derringer with his answer as stated above, and note to this court that this matter is in no way a normal divorce situation as will be described below, having an extreme disaster preceding the irrational, and desperate Petitioner’s Petition brought under emotional distress, despair, desperation, coercion of third parties, and when going through traumatic stress syndrome, making this Petition premature before any professional counseling, and thus a Petition brought in a state of emotional turmoil and unsound mind, that must be delayed until emotional stability is proven balanced inside the Petitioner. This involves not only required counseling, and verification of proper medication taken by the Petitioner under prescription of her normal hormone, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, and tranquilizer medications, but requires “TIME TO EMOTIONALLY HEAL” that demand of this court to deny the instant Petition for Dissolution of Marriage and place an Order of Deferral for the Petitioner Barrie Derringer not to be able to file any other Petitions for Dissolution of Marriage, or Petitions for any Legal Separation for a period of one year until the counseling and time needed for emotional repair has rendered the Petitioner of sound mind and body under proper verified medications so as to be entirely rational if such a future Petition is then considered. “Mistake” under the meaning of NMRA Rule 1-060, must not be made by a court of law, bound by Canon 3 (B)(2) mandates to enforce the sanctity of the institution of “marriage” in the United States, when delay and supervision of errant decisions by the Petitioner in DM-12-610 produce valid “cause” to deny this Petition and wait until any future such decision is warranted, if at all. In January 2012 Barrie Derringer stated to David Derringer in conversation that: “even if we get divorced, we can always re-marry” showing not only her doubt to the sequence of events leading up to this Petition that may not be at all valid, but demands “cause” to this court to stop this proceeding, and take steps to counsel and verify the intents of the parties over time, so that likely a divorce can be avoided at all costs, which is mandated under the United States laws to save the marriage, not facilitate its destruction by the courts. Moreau v. Detchemendy, 18 Mo. 522, 1853 WL 4638 Mo. 1853. “The social relations of every member of the community should be clearly defined and conclusively set at rest”. Astor v. Astor, 120 So. 2d 176 Fla. 1960. Very easily proven to this court in “phone texts” of Sprint, the two Derringers of Barrie and David are totally “in love” so that with the proper circumstances of abode agreeable to Barrie Derringer, there is no reason whatsoever that the Derringers cannot be in total harmony, as long as the persons “interfering with the legal marriage stay out indefinitely”. It is proven both in hearing of February 21, 2012 and in the David Derringer Motions and testimony of David Derringer and Barrie Derringer (testimony under oath of Barrie Derringer: “David Derringer would NEVER hurt me physically” hearing of February 21, 2012 ) that this “IS NOT” a marriage that has any domestic violence, wherein it is thus in the best interests of the parties to stay together forever, and not for the court to force a separation or divorce. The DV-12-234 was filed by bad advice of third parties seeking to force the Respondent into oblivion and to not help his wife in emotional distress, unfounded in facts and without evidence. Both parties are better off in this world with their deep love protecting and loving each other, than each alone separately or with another. The Derringer family unit has to be supported by this Court for practical purposes and as a matter of basic dignity. Without the right to marriage itself, we are denied full respect and dignity. Hernandez v. Robles, 7 Misc.3d 459, 794 NYS.2d 579 NY Sup. 2005. “Marriage is often termed a civil contract” that must be upheld to the best ability of both husband and wife, not one deserting the other in adverse circumstances, but both simply working to make their life better. “Marriage” is viewed as the ‘preeminent basis for civil institutions’ which gives character to our whole civil polity. Maynard v. Hill, 125 US 190, 8 United State Supreme Court 723, 31 L.Ed.654 (1888). The Derringer marriage will be shown to be sound with true love as the core, that must be repaired and continued through counseling/mediation, and it will be shown definitively that on Barrie Derringer’s side, the “friends”, “family” and “employers”, there is a “conspiracy” and penchant to defeat this marriage, using Barrie Derringer’s subservient and submissive personality, coupled with submission to parental authority, and attitude to accomplish those goals; such “goals” not at all in the best interest of either Derringer party. Barrie Derringer has always known and has constantly admitted that David Derringer loves her with all of his heart, and has no reason to rationally abandon and disregard that love and protection from her spouse in spontaneous decisions based in desperation and distress for a place to live after the fire devastation of the Derringer home. The court can see “logistically” that a 56 year old woman, in her third marriage, that has a husband that is faithful, honest, hard working, and a husband that has never harmed her either physically or verbally, but is gentle and loving, and that she knows the man loves her with all of his heart, in that excellent marriage relationship that was working perfectly always and up until December 22, 2011, does not throw all of that away in a “whim” in a matter of two days after Christmas on December 27, 2011, and never want to have any further talking or contact again thorough a “no contact order” of DV-12-234 and the Temporary Domestic Order of DM-12-610 and to push for a divorce. It will be shown to this court that there are ulterior motives of others that intend to destroy this Derringer marriage for their own gain, and that it encompasses “corruption of motives” of personal egos, control, possession, “unjust enrichment” and “enslavement” against the submissive Barrie Derringer to ruin the lives of the Derringers, their marriage and sabotage the rights of Barrie Derringer forever. This court has a duty to read all David Derringer “motions” in DV-12-234 as they all have a direct and intertwined bearing on DM-12-610 and the need to deny and dismiss DM-12-610, and it is also imperative for the court to also read the CASE No. CV-2012-01307 PLAINTIFF’‘S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS WITH SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT, that defines the subversion and facilitation of both DV-12-234 and DM-12-610 by criminal motives and acts of others demanding and forcing Barrie Derringer to make these illegal filings in the Domestic Violence and Divorce Courts. Any pragmatic person can see there is more going on here in this iceberg directly affected by bad advise of third parties meddling in the mind of the Petitioner. State ex rel Stratton v. Sinks, 106 N.M. 213, 220, 741 P.2d 435, 442 (Ct. App. 1987) “substantial evidence is such relevant evidence that a reasonable mind would find adequate to support a conclusion.” The rational person can easily see that the devoted husband of David Derringer with all love for his wife is the only person that truly offers ultimate “protection” of the vulnerable Barrie Derringer which is of ultimate concern both to David Derringer and this court. This court cannot allow or enable this Petition to progress forward, which was brought under the conditions of a Petitioner’s mind in emotional distress, desperation, unbalanced mood swings, under duress and traumatic stress syndrome, and with coercion and force by third parties seeking to force the divorce of Barrie Derringer and David Derringer for their own agendas of egos, hatred, subversion, exploitation and other unethical and illegal motives. Such third parties that are defined below are the Petitioner’s bosses of NAI Maestas and Ward employer Debbie Harms, Irwin Harms, Steve Maestas and the parents of the Petitioner of Jerry and Warren Crowe that seek all to harm the Petitioner and her life and marriage due to exploitation, and in the case of parents exert parental control of the life of an adult with acts of sabotage, emotional blackmail and forced manipulation against a son-in-law disliked. It is the testimony of the Petitioner on February 21, 2012 in DV-12-234 that the parents Jerry and Warren Crowe are “financing” this attempt to divorce and sabotage the marriage of the parties, and this court has a duty to read the Derringer v. Maestas et al suit of CV-2012-01307 that define explicitly the “interference with marriage, torts, criminal exploitation, and criminal blackmail, subversion, kidnaping, and involuntary servitude forced upon Barrie Derringer by these “bosses” and wherein it is these bosses that forced, advised and facilitated Barrie Derringer breaking the criminal codes of the United States to lie and conduct fraud in the domestic violence courts and to falsely attain the Temporary Domestic Order against husband David Derringer when David Derringer is not guilty of any possible scenario of “hurting”, “intimidating”, “controlling” or otherwise abusing Barrie Derringer.
In short, when the Petitioner, through no fault of her own, was the most vulnerable and distraught after an emotional disaster of December 23, 2011, of the residence lost to the Derringers that represented the good future well being of the married Derringers, the 8 pets that died in such a short period with 5 of these loved pets burned in the house fire, the Parents and employment bosses “preyed” upon the Petitioner when Barrie was “desperate”, when they knew that such Petitioner even in good times was entirely submissive and subservient to both force and authority, and chose to use the disaster of the Derringer marriage circumstances to exploit Barrie Derringer for their own nasty agendas and to attempt to permanently remove the husband David Derringer.
Barrie Derringer has a history of being suicidal and to use spontaneous decisions without proper consideration under extreme stress. The decision of Barrie Derringer after the disaster of December 23, 2011 to use only “self-help” and not professional counseling, and to allow and follow bad advice of the partial and biased third parties, and to not attend and disregard her marriage obligations and disregard the love of her spouse to instead succumb to the pressure and “bad advice” of meddling and interfering third parties bent on the destruction of the Derringer marriage, was what precipitated both the DV-12-234 Petition for Order of Protection and TRO, and the filing of the Temporary Domestic Order and Petition for Dissolution of Marriage of DM-12-610. The bad advice of others overwhelmed the Petitioner’s rational thought, and Barrie Derringer acted on impulse of other’s goading which precipitated the “criminal acts” by Barrie Derringer to file fraudulent “domestic violence” charges and Petitions against husband David Derringer and to actually lie in criminal perjury in a court of law, in the DV-12-234 hearing of February 21, 2012 as well as the coercion and criminal activity by Barrie Derringer with these third parties in “facilitation” to break and enter the storage units three times over a period of one month to take all personal property of the Derringers. These acts accomplished by Barrie Derringer with the total help and physical assistance of the third parties in criminal acts was to attempt to take everything not only of property of Barrie Derringer, but also to take every item of the Derringer’s community property, and then to steal many items of husband David Derringer’s personal property and then to vandalize, destroy and disregard all of David Derringer’s property without cause. David Derringer has never known Barrie Derringer formerly to lie, cheat or steal, or do violent or vicious acts against any person as her now “new personality” under some cult control of others since December 27, 2011 after she left David Derringer. David Derringer at no time since he met Barrie Derringer has verbally abused or physically abused his wife, and instead sought to protect the vulnerable Barrie Derringer from any that might hurt her in any way. David Derringer’s love for Barrie Derringer has been deep and unconditional under even the most egregious circumstances, including, but not limited to after the unwarranted attack against husband David Derringer by Barrie Derringer in the Domestic Violence Court and this Divorce Court; acts undeserving under any conditions, but which have tested David Derringer’s love for his wife to the extreme; with David Derringer right now still sticking to his marriage vows and the extra “promise” to Barrie Derringer in January 2012 that David Derringer will endure any extreme to be there waiting for Barrie Derringer in love for her when she comes out of the emotional tunnel in emotional soundness in the future when the aftermath of the burning home and irrational attacks on husband David Derringer are finally over. David Derringer stands by his wife no matter what, “in good or bad”, even under this recent extreme damage, and still wants Barrie Derringer back as his wife, when any other man would abandon her under far less than these dire circumstances. It seems that “others” have directed and encouraged Barrie undeservingly to extract either revenge or retribution against a husband that has done nothing ever to hurt or affect the Petitioner in any way other than to love Barrie Derringer with all of his heart, and to protect and defend Barrie Derringer from any that would hurt her physically or mentally.
1) The parties met on July 7, 2009, were “in love” by July 10, 2009, and were married in La Plata County, Colorado on January 15, 2010 and have been married as husband and wife in a perfect union relationship without discord ever since for a period of over 6 months in Bernalillo County, New Mexico, until the fire disaster of December 23, 2011 rendered the Petitioner emotionally unstable, who then sought to act upon her spontaneous and irrational decisions in desperation to save only herself in the aftermath of the disaster, with the Petitioner seeking refuge with others instead of staying with her husband in the aftermath, and to thus abandon and foreclose the marriage in acts of desperation, confusion, and despair, and has unwisely chosen not to seek the needed counseling, but listened and acted in fraud by bad advice of third parties.
2) The Petitioner and the Respondent were living in total harmony in a deep love that has existed since three days after they first met on July 7, 2009, until the disaster of December 23, 2011, documented each day multiple times in phone texts and loving gestures and acts by both parties, and there is not any existence of irreconcilable incompatibility that cannot be rendered repaired and corrected with counseling and proper living abode for the couple. The temperament and outlook of the parties are a perfect match of a long term relationship of both compatibility, common beliefs, common interests, the outlook between them for common goals, and the deep love between them, since the time they met, and at no time prior to December 23, 2011 have there been any other than a total trust, love bond and comfortable living and sharing experiences between Barrie Derringer and David Derringer. If there was ever a love everlasting, and wherein the couple were at total ease and were meant to be together for the rest of their lives, this is that marriage until the disaster of December 23, 2011, wherein thus, the counseling repair entirely possible would redirect the couple back to the harmonious bond that all marriages seek. Counseling thus is imperative to save this marriage and the institution of marriage in the United States protected by law.
3) There are no children born of this marriage nor expected and both parties have acknowledged that the “family” of the Derringers consists of loving pets that are considered the children of the couple. After the disaster of December 23, 2011 wherein five of the Derringer animals were burned in a home fire, just after three had just died of old age, thus killing 8 pets of the Derringers in a period of less than two weeks, the Petitioner was so distraught and emotionally unstable in a mental breakdown and traumatic stress disorder that Barrie Derringer sought to block and deny all further emotional bonds under the hurt of the disaster so as to break contact with the husband that loves her and disavow any connections with the remaining animals so as to mitigate and stop the emotional heartbreak of the 8 dead animals, with irrational decisions to stop contact with the “Derringer family” and to remove herself from the locations of the husband and other animals and to thus attempt to have a totally different location and human contact so as to alleviate the emotional trauma, rather than seek professional help in this unsolvable self doctored manner.
4) The Petitioner Barrie Derringer has acquired personal property in her life prior to this marriage that was blended into the Derringer marriage, but which certain tangible items are acknowledged to be the property of Barrie Derringer, but that will be defined and itemized in any divorce settlement agreement, if a total reconciliation cannot be properly reached at some point in the future as it should be.
5) All Barrie Derringer property claimed as “separate” and distinct has all been taken by Barrie Derringer in a time frame of December 27, 2011 when Barrie Derringer first left David Derringer under duress, and then on January 2, 2012, January 3, 2012, January 8, 2012, and through three illegal break-ins of Derringer storage on February 4, 2012, February 25, 2012 and March 8, 2012. Barrie Derringer has in these acts also taken all of the Derringer community property and much of the personal David Derringer property which David Derringer had acquired prior to the marriage with Barrie Derringer. At no time has David Derringer hurt Barrie Derringer or any of her personal property, nor will he in the future.
6) All prior to any divorce filing and also well prior to any marital settlement agreement, with “force”, in criminal and unethical acts orchestrated by “third parties” and Barrie Derringer, to achieve “unjust enrichment” to win the divorce property improperly, the Petitioner has also removed and taken all Derringer property (to include Barrie Derringer personal property, community property and David Derringer property) in other storage facilities of vehicles, travel trailer, and it is also presumed that all personal property of the Derringers whether “community or not”, has been also removed by Barrie Derringer from storage at her friend Kris Riley at 8809 Rio Grande Unit 1 of piano and music and many other items, and outside furniture and BBQ and cabinets at the home of Barrie Derringer’s parents Jerry and Warren Crowe at Tanoan Country Club in Albuquerque, NM. Other items taken by Barrie Derringer at the “other” storages contain also personal property of David Derringer. Ultimately, it is the “marriage” and love between the parties that is important in the lives of the Derringers and not the tangible property that should motivate the reconciliation parameters.
7) Petitioner has acquired certain debts prior to the Derringer marriage that were assumed and assisted in payment by husband David Derringer for the benefit of his wife, including, but not limited to IRS debt, and other past due credit cards, in which the Derringer’s “collectively” paid community funds for attorneys and other expenses to mitigate and delete these previous Barrie Derringer debts. David Derringer used personal “Mary MacGregor Derringer inheritance funds (David Derringer’s deceased mother) in “community assistance” to his wife Barrie Derringer to pay debts solely from Barrie Derringer’s past marriage with Charles Beverley to amount to “thousands of dollars”. If the Derringer marriage should be denied, the moneys spent for prior Barrie Derringer debts not initially the responsibility of the Respondent should be reimbursed to David Derringer, but David Derringer believes that the marriage is most important for the parties and the past debts incurred by exclusively Barrie Derringer to be resolved by a husband is part of a proper marriage. At all times David Derringer was a “very good husband to Barrie Derringer out of his love for her”, including now.
8) The parties of David Derringer and Barrie Derringer have acquired community property, all of which has already been taken by Barrie Derringer in a time frame of December 27, 2011 when Barrie Derringer first left David Derringer under duress, and then on January 2, 2012, January 3, 2012, January 8, 2012, and through three illegal break-ins of the Derringer storage on February 4, 2012, February 25, 2012 and March 8, 2012. Barrie Derringer has in these acts also taken all of the Derringer community property and much of the personal David Derringer property which David Derringer had acquired prior to the marriage with Barrie Derringer. Clearly, any proper “division” of community property would include a complete inventory of what Barrie Derringer currently has, what Barrie Derringer has sold, destroyed or disposed of in any manner and all purchases of Barrie Derringer of any items since December 27, 2011, including new clothing, appliances or any other items, that are partly the possession of David Derringer, whether to be divided by item or by monetary value back to David Derringer.
9) Community debt has been ongoing, but with specific monetary input from David Derringer when “sole and separate” personal David Derringer inheritance funds were used in “community assistance” with money from Mary MacGregor Derringer (David Derringer’s deceased mother) for the large down payment of the Derringer Chevrolet 2005 dually truck and other matters. Should a divorce ensue, which is totally opposed by the Respondent, the Petitioner should repay the money used in “inheritance funds” to the Respondent.
10) The parties have obligations that would need to be specifically defined before any decision could be made as to anything allocated between them.
11) The Petitioner comes to this court DM-12-610 in more criminal fraud, in the same stance as in the perjury and fraud of the DV-12-234, with claims that the Petitioner is in need of spousal support. This “criminal fraud” and “perjury” is punishable by the court. US v. Miller, 161 F.3d 977 cert denied Byrnes v. US 119 Supreme Court 1275, 143 L.Ed.2d 369 “CA6 (Mich.) Obstruction of Justice statute proscribes subornation of perjury.”; Martinez v. Winner, 771 F.2d 424 opinion modified on denial of rehearing 778 F.2d 553, cert granted, vacated; Tyus v. Martinez, 106 Supreme Court 1787, 475 US 1138, 90 L.Ed.2d 333 on remand 800 F.2d 230 “A judge is not only entitled, but also has a duty to take all lawful measures reasonably necessary to prevent the occurrence of a crime in his courtroom.” Petitioner, Barrie Derringer, age 56, has an income of $45,000.00 and is currently working as an accountant for the Commercial Real Estate firm of NAI Maestas and Ward, and that wife income is 85% of the Derringer family income. Clearly, if a divorce should ensue, Barrie Derringer is in a position of income to fully support herself and cannot demand or take the minimal several hundreds of dollars of her husbands SSI disability income. Husband, David Derringer Respondent, however, has cancer, and has another medical problem of throat constriction “Barrett’s Disease”, that requires hospitalization several times each year, David Derringer does not work, and is beyond the work force at 63 years of age, and has only an SSI disability federal income of $698.00 per month. On or about January 16th, 2012, after Barrie Derringer had been gone for several weeks, she changed her “direct deposit” of paycheck to another account or bank and prevented husband David Derringer from any access to 85% of the Derringer’s family income. Because of these acts of Barrie Derringer taking most of the family income for only herself, David Derringer has been unable to pay bills since January 2012, cannot have food and necessities of life for himself and the animals, and it is also adversely affecting the credit of both Barrie Derringer and David Derringer with non-payments and late payments of creditors. Barrie Derringer cannot dupe this court into believing that she needs “spousal support” in fraud, but must be made accountable for the interim assistance of David Derringer and the Derringer animals for $800.00 per month and at least another $80.00 for gasoline transportation retroactive to January 2012 for the support of spouse David Derringer. In the meantime, Barrie Derringer rolls in the income without bills for use only by herself with plenty of food, rents a three bedroom home only for herself at $900.00 per month, and “rides high”, while making her husband destitute. After Barrie Derringer stopped David Derringer from having her 85% of the family income in January, David Derringer has been in extreme emergency since that time and interim spousal support should continue until Barrie Derringer reunites with husband David Derringer in a full reconciliation with the parties living together in an abode, or in the alternative, continue interim spousal support for David Derringer in the instance in which the marriage is in reconciliation efforts where Barrie Derringer does not yet live with David Derringer. If the marriage is dissolved in the future, Barrie Derringer should pay David Derringer spousal support in the amount of $1,200.00 per month for a period of two years after the divorce becomes final as David Derringer scrambles thus to regain his financial balance without the marriage, thus David Derringer needing proven spousal support on SSI disability, and none for Barrie Derringer coming from David Derringer. In the interim of this entire matter, without conscience or morality listening likely to other third parties, wife Barrie Derringer has kept husband David Derringer without enough money for anything.
12) The Petitioner has hired a representing attorney Alain Jackson to file bogus and fraudulent proven actions against her husband David Derringer with both the Domestic Violence Court and the Marital Court. These acts are proven both perjury and fraud in the testimony and lack of substantial evidence, in fact “no evidence” to either accuse or prove that David Derringer at any time “hurt” Barrie Derringer or her hip or caused “bruises” that have no documented photographs. Moreover, the violence “claims” of Barrie Derringer were to have happened on February 4, 2012 by written Barrie Derringer “Petition for Order of Protection” wherein David Derringer has introduced evidence of the APD police report proving that no violence took place on that date. Tyus v. Martinez, 106 Supreme Court 1787, 475 US 1138, 90 L.Ed.2d 333 on remand 800 F.2d 230. The perjury and fraud of Barrie Derringer and her attorney Alain Jackson are of documented record, and beyond belief of the Respondent why at any time his wife would have stooped so low in criminal acts to accuse husband David Derringer of such atrocities when David Derringer loves his wife with all of his heart and has never done any such acts of violence. Notwithstanding, Petitioner, Barrie Derringer, age 56, has an income of $45,000.00 and is currently working as an accountant for the Commercial Real Estate firm of NAI Maestas and Ward, and that wife income is 85% of the Derringer family income. Clearly, if a divorce should ensue, Barrie Derringer is in a position of paying all of her bogus attorney fees without taking the minimal several hundreds of dollars of her husbands SSI disability income. Husband, David Derringer Respondent, however, has cancer, and has another medical problem of throat constriction “Barrett’s Disease”, that requires hospitalization several times each year, David Derringer does not work, and is beyond the work force at 63 years of age, and has only an SSI disability federal income of $698.00 per month, and both cannot and should not be paying attorney fees for a bogus action for domestic violence and divorce proceedings that were brought in proven perjury and fraud, and David Derringer should not be thus responsible for any “court costs” for filing these bogus claims or Petitions. None of this should be happening here if a rational Barrie Derringer would only have simply talked and worked with her husband, wherein the joint decision had already been made after the fire on December 23, 2012 that the “Derringers” had to rent an apartment for the convenience and comfort of Barrie Derringer so that they could assess the damages, re-access their lives and goals and pick up the pieces of the disaster and make new and different plans. Instead of this conscientious repair of the aftermath of the disaster with her husband, Barrie Derringer leaves David Derringer with the total burden of the cleaning up of the disaster and “cuts and runs” to take all of the money and find a place for only herself to be secure, warm and have “running water” leaving her husband in “abandonment” of their former loyalty and trust, and simply discards all marriage vows, and hires an attorney to then “attack” husband David Derringer without cause. For these reasons and that of above, Barrie Derringer can certainly pay her own attorney fees if a divorce is final. If the proper reconciliation occurs however, the Derringers will simply have to absorb the devastation created by Barrie Derringer and put it behind them and better their marriage and lives, which is the hope of husband David Derringer, and thus no attorney fees would be applicable.
13) The Respondent has been illegally and unjustifiably bound by bogus, illegal, non-jurisdictional and fraudulent “restraining” orders, in both DV-12-234 and DM-12-610 which the Respondent has obeyed despite their illegality. The Respondent’s “hands have been tied” both to attempt to talk rationally to his wife, show or advise his wife that he still loves her unconditionally and want her back to reconstruct their lives, and has been kept from any contact with his wife over issues that affect Barrie Derringer exclusively so as to assist and continue to be a “good husband” to his wife in the interim. These “issues” include the IRS billing that will eventually “garnish” the wages of the Petitioner and other matters that should be resolved. In short, Barrie Derringer has allowed third parties to ruin the marriage and lives of both of the Derringers instead of sticking like glue to her own husband that loves her and has done “self-inflicted” damages to herself through her own ignorance and neglect of herself. David Derringer, however has complied with the law, and submitted many Motions, documents, pleadings and other legal papers in both DV-12-234 and DM-12-610 that legally and properly seek to dissolve all restraining orders and divorce proceedings, that all have been “un-opposed” making it necessary for the Court to honor these motions with “approval” for David Derringer, and as of yet all Derringer motions have been “ignored” by the court. Any Motion that is un-opposed should be granted by the court. With the proper dissolving of all of the “restraining” orders, David Derringer and Barrie Derringer would be totally free to actually communicate as should have been done by Barrie Derringer at the onset of this matter on December 27, 2011 and all matters would be resolved between them. The attitude of “force” by Barrie Derringer at the obvious bad advice of boss Debbie Harms, since the beginning of this of December 27, 2011, with a totally different temperament and personality than of Barrie’s real self known as the wife of David Derringer has done nothing but damages to all lives of those involved. The “restraining orders” illegally and without merit placed against David Derringer also ruin the life of Barrie Derringer and eliminate the husband assistance that could be there for her own benefit. This “insane” action of Barrie Derringer has done nothing but cost everyone grief and money and has only been an action of a power play, when Barrie Derringer only needed a “good place to live” which David Derringer was at all times trying to provide, and had agreed on December 23, 2011 that a good apartment for wife Barrie Derringer was imperative, but Barrie Derringer chose not to work with her husband and instead leave David Derringer in desperation, and turn and attack her husband as a rabid dog; none of which was ever deserved, nor in the “normal” personality of Barrie Derringer.
FACTS AND HISTORY ENTIRELY APPURTENANT TO THIS MATTER
The wife, Petitioner, Barrie Derringer left husband David Derringer on December 27, 2011 after the Derringer home burned down killing five of the Derringer dogs Mikey, Captain, Toby, Cisco and Dingo. It is believed by husband that wife Barrie Derringer is going through extreme trauma stress disorder of the emergency coupled with extreme pressure from friends, bosses and family to get rid of husband David Derringer and to then take all money and community property, and for Barrie Derringer to start a “new life”. Barrie Derringer’s parents of Jerry and Warren Crowe have never liked their son-in-law, husband David Derringer, and with wife Barrie Derringer in an extremely irrational and emotional state after the fire and burning of the five dogs, just days after the Derringer family also lost three other pets to old age of the Barrie Derringer “buddy” for 18 years cat Fuji, the Derringer cat Panther also about 18, and the Derringer pet donkey El Cid of 32 years, the parents have not only put extreme pressure for Barrie Derringer to have left David Derringer but are forcing and financing Barrie Derringer to divorce David Derringer. This “exploitation” of Barrie Derringer by the Crowe parents and Maestas and Ward boss Debbie Harmes, with Barrie Derringer in extreme trauma stress disorder to force the agenda of divorce from a husband that loves, protects and worships this woman and has never done anything to harm Barrie physically or mentally, is “criminal”. This is compounded by unethical attorney Alain Jackson. This “irrational” decision by Barrie Derringer to leave David Derringer on December 27, 2011 under pressure from parents and bosses had left husband David Derringer with the extreme mending of the various emergencies in the aftermath of the home burning disaster with Barrie leaving her husband when he needed her help the most, only four days after the disaster (right after “Christmas”). David Derringer was left with the grim and extremely emotional task of “search and rescue” for the last two small dog bodies in the fire of “Mikey” and “Captain”, after just two days earlier with Barrie and David having to retrieve the other three dogs bodies from the Animal Control, and retrieving a trailer stuck in a ditch in the extreme snow and ice, and the retrieval of the Derringer truck with broken brake line buried in the snow and ice, to be preformed without his wife’s help due to her leaving David Derringer with all burdens of the recovery of the disaster.
Despite husband David Derringer trying to put the marriage back together with phone text, phone conversations and messaging, and six “in-person” meetings with wife Barrie Derringer and wherein there were times in some of these “meetings” that Barrie Derringer unleashed notice of her love for David Derringer with kisses, hugs and crying, but then David Derringer was again defeated by the pressure from family, friends and bosses to keep Barrie Derringer from getting back together with David Derringer. This itself indicates the necessity to deny and dismiss the Petition for Dissolution of Marriage DM-12-610 at this time and Order no further filings by Barrie Derringer until a year has passed to repair the marriage or establish there really is a need for a divorce, after giving the Derringer marriage a proper chance of recovery.
BARRIE DERRINGER SUBSERVIENT AND EASILY MANIPULATED PERSONALITY THAT PRECIPITATED THE FILINGS WITHOUT PROPER COMMUNICATION WITH HUSBAND DAVID DERRINGER BEFOREHAND
When David Derringer met Barrie Beverley, she was working full time for Maestas and Ward, after being hired as a 搕emp?by them when working for another company. Maestas and Ward immediately investigated and 損rofiled?Barrie Beverley to find that she is the most subservient and malleable person available. The 損rofile?shows Barrie Beverley as the least assertive and the most passive person. Stated as; She does not appear to be very aggressive, dominant or comfortable with conflict. She may tend to be overly accommodating and not very tough. This is the perfect person for anyone to exploit and abuse. All times that David Derringer has known Barrie, David sought to have her gain other employment where she would be treated fairly. The Derringers for years attempted to leave New Mexico and possibly into Canada, and the outside forces that created the DV-12-234 and DM-12 610 would not have happened. Barrie Derringer is the most extreme of being subservient and dominated as these Petitions have shown that others can even force Barrie to lie and do fraud well outside of her normal personality known by David Derringer with others in total “control” of Barrie Derringer. Thus, with Barrie in the hands of those of boss Debbie Harmes and parents Jerry and Warren Crowe, that wants husband David Derringer out of Barrie’s life, Barrie Derringer has become the subservient slave of Debbie Harms and wherein Debbie Harms criminally assaulted David Derringer in the break in of February 4, 2012 to show Barrie Derringer her forced control. Barrie Derringer at no times ever contests the abuse of her husband (son-in-law) by Barrie’s parents, and at no time has ever stood up against any bad act done in her presence against her own husband. This coercion and pressure of Jerry and Warren Crowe is easily seen with Barrie Derringer now seeking to change her name back to Barrie Lee Crowe, a last name which she dislikes and did not take back that last name in two separate previous divorces with Charles Beverley, keeping instead the last name Beverley. (SEE: DM-08-4526)
Barrie has thus been “confused” in life since the disaster of December 23, 2011, and on February 6, 2012 Barrie Derringer filed in both fraud and perjury a Domestic Violence “Petition for Order of Protection” currently under appeal, and continued to be irrational in thought of any future with her husband, by being coerced also to file for divorce in this matter of DM-12-610. Barrie Derringer simply took very bad advice and was pressured from parents, friends, boss Debbie Harms of Maestas and Ward, (SEE: Derringer v. Maestas and Ward, Debbie Harmes et al. CV-2012-01307) and turned to being un-co-operative, “lying” to the court and turning into a “criminal” in order to get her way in the Domestic Violence court (SEE: DV-12-234) with criminal facilitation of attorney Alain Jackson. After meeting husband David Derringer multiple times in person, from January 2nd to January 26th, 2012 (SEE Sprint Text records of [Exhibit 1] of court record DV-12-234{22 pages}) in dark parking lots alone, letting husband David Derringer into her car to talk, Barrie Derringer locking herself in the storage unit with David Derringer to talk and proposed go dancing and other acts showing there is no “fear”by Barrie Derringer or concern of being “hurt”, wherein Barrie Derringer knows with certainty that David Derringer loves his wife with all of his heart, Barrie Derringer then defrauds the court with her Petition for Order for Protection, lying that David Derringer would “hurt her” and she is extremely afraid of her husband David Derringer, “even in a courtroom” , and yet then Barrie Derringer testifies under Oath, that “David Derringer would NEVER hurt me physically” ( SEE court record of DV-12-234, February 21, 2012). Barrie Derringer then “lies” in the Petition of DV-12-234 of February 6, 2012, that on February 4th, 2012 she was knocked down by David Derringer, got her hip hurt and has “bruises” and is extremely afraid of David Derringer; this coming after the Barrie Derringer “break-in” on that day of February 4th, 2012 of which 9 APD officers showed up with David Derringer’s “911" call and where there was no “violence” occurring on the police report, and wherein APD told Barrie Derringer and her friends to “leave”, despite Barrie Derringer lying on the Petition for Order of Protection that David Derringer “prevented” Barrie Derringer from leaving. In that “incident” David Derringer was criminally attacked in assault and battery by Debbie Harmes, to show that “Debbie” had full control of Barrie and tried to control Barrie’s husband, when several men and a “friend of Barrie Derringer” were holding David Derringer down, and when David Derringer was “released” just before the police arrived, Barrie Derringer walked right to David Derringer and put both of her hands on David Derringer’s face in what some called a “loving gesture” and showed that “in extreme times” Barrie Derringer knows that under no set of circumstances would David Derringer ever hurt her. These lies of Barrie Derringer are of proven fraud due to the Sprint phone text printout and the APD police report of the incident of February 4, 2012.
Barrie Beverley’s first two marriages were to the same man, an abusive “biker”, with the same abuses and cheating each time that finally ended after thirty years. This was a bad situation at all times, but also unfortunately shows the “subservient” attitude and submissiveness of the personality of Barrie that is a delicate and fragile thing to both be aware of and protect from harm. As current devoted husband, David is well aware that Barrie can be manipulated and coerced into many things and is very susceptible to spontaneous irrational decisions without proper investigation and thought and not only does this husband not violate that vulnerability but guards against others that choose to do so. A good example of this vulnerability and susceptible manipulation happened right before David met Barrie Beverley wherein a man on “My Cupid” chose to email and phone Barrie multiple times over just a short period of less than two weeks to gain her trust and tunnel vision of a future, and wherein grave mistakes were made by Barrie Beverley (now Derringer) multiple time after time to send this man several wire money transfers amounting to almost $20,000.00. This is a prime example of the personality coupled with the manic/depression disorder that allows without check bad decisions to be multiple and sometimes ongoing without a proper husband to protect this vulnerable individual, which she now has in David Derringer and his love for her.
INTERFERENCE OF THE DERRINGER MARRIAGE BY THIRD PARTY OUTSIDERS
Barrie Derringer works for NAI Maestas and Ward LLC as their “accountant”. Maestas and Ward is owned by Defendant Steve Maestas and Defendant Debbie Harms, and Defendant Debbie Harms and Defendant Irwin Harms own the sister incestual company totally intertwined with Maestas of Sun Vista Enterprises Inc.. What is happening to Barrie Derringer is that she is NOT “free to work where she wants”, due to the employer denying federal employment laws and working Barrie Derringer many hours without proper pay that destroy the Derringer marriage. Barrie’s “employer” violates the Petitioner with illegal work scheduling and denial of lunch and other matters that defeating the Derringer marriage and affect the life and health of the Derringer family. Maestas ruin the marriage relationship, keeping Barrie and David Derringer awake at night in pressure and anxiety from the employer, ruining sleep, sex life and disrupting harmony of the private lives of the Derringers. Multiple times wife Barrie is forced to go to work, unable to sleep in the middle of the night at 2:00AM and other unreasonable times, causing emotional distress and mental anguish and worry by her husband with his wife in distress and despair, and the worry of her driving miles to work in the middle of night by herself, in the snow or David Derringer was forced to drive Barrie to work at all odd hours. The erratic and non-paid extra work demanded by the Employer have forced wife Barrie to disrupt the vacations, scheduled trips and entertainment events planned by the Derringer’s, disrupted the medical emergencies of David Derringer, and caused undue hardship and stress in the marriage and family life of the Derringers. Barrie Derringer has been continuously “exploited” in the workplace, placing extreme distress and burdens upon the emotional state of David Derringer trying at all times to protect his vulnerable wife. The demands, abuse and demeaning activity of Steve Maestas and Debbie Harms have caused wife Barrie Derringer to be forced into the wrong priorities of the job in preference to the husband David Derringer and the family life, and Debbie Harms instigated and forced Barrie to file in DV-12-234 and DM-12-610. In short, instead of working to have a personal life and marriage, as normalcy, in this matter the job force and subversion of wife Barrie has taken the place of all other aspects of life, negating the personal life and marriage, making the job the only focus of the Derringer family. DV-12-234 and DM-12-610 were brought about by the coercion and forceful power plays of Barrie’s employer and family, and not in the free will of Barrie Derringer who was under extreme shock and emotional traumatic stress disorder due to the Derringer home burning and the burning of the five Derringer dogs in the disaster incident, and the third parties immediately took opportunistic “control” of the vulnerable Barrie Derringer so as to force their own agenda of “exploitation” against Barrie Derringer and David Derringer. It was the illegal “advice” of Debbie Harms that coerced Barrie Derringer to file the proven lies and fraud of the “domestic violence” petitions and the “divorce” petitions, after Debbie Harms failed to intimidate the Plaintiff on February 4, 2012. The “criminal fraud” of the petitions by Barrie Derringer under the “direction” of Debbie Harms were to very carefully tailor the future if “destruction” or “disappearance” of Barrie Derringer were necessary if criminal “book-keeping” prosecution were immanent in any federal investigations. The “domestic violence” petitions were for the following scenarios:
1) Create the court impression that David Derringer harmed his wife and therefore Barrie Derringer needs not only protection but isolation and seclusion where no one could find her or the community property. David Derringer is the only person in the world that truly loves his wife, and would at all times seek to ensure her safety, so the effect is that without David Derringer, Barrie Derringer could come up “missing” at any time with few in concern. David Derringer has contacted the FBI about this matter.
2) Obtain a fraudulent Order to break into the Derringer storage, and seize the Derringer loaded firearms so that Barrie Derringer has access to “suicide” or the appearance of suicide if necessary without much investigation.
3) Attainment of the David Derringer firearms ensures that if Barrie Derringer is ever killed, the firearms used will be of David Derringer’s with David Derringer prints all over the firearms, and the “domestic violence” petitions would give motive and realism that it was David Derringer that could have killed his wife in a “rage” of defiance of the Order of Protection, thus exonerating any criminal acts by others.
4) Keep David Derringer from any further contact with his wife so as to obtain a pure effect of total control over Barrie Derringer without interference of the husband for further exploitation and “unjust enrichment” from Barrie Derringer’s work without pay. Barrie working over 700 hours each year without pay amount to over $10,000.
The “work” of Maestas and oppression and tyranny in the workplace, take away the emotional stability of Barrie Derringer, as well as interfere with the marital contract in such a way as to replace the marriage with constant work without pay, and have already come close to causing the death of Barrie Derringer by suicide to “escape” the torture and illegal treatment of her bosses. Barrie ignores that Debbie Harms physically attacked her husband in assault and battery on February 4, 2012, to both show Barrie Derringer that Debbie and her employer had full control over Barrie, “or else”, and they attempted to keep the husband from any further interference with the cult control of Barrie Derringer, so they could continue to abuse Barrie Derringer as before, as well as keeping her enslaved into illegal and corrupt matters involving finances with intimidation “not to tell even her husband” anything about the company, as to why they force this “divorce”. David Derringer has brought in the US Department of Labor and the FBI for a full investigation and is trying to save Barrie and the Derringer marriage from this cult. David Derringer is not simply a “disgruntled husband facing a divorce” but is trying to save his wife and keep their marriage due to David’s love of Barrie Derringer. This involves criminal personal physical attack on David Derringer, involuntary servitude and enslavement of both David Derringer and his wife Barrie Derringer, cult control of the mind, time and physical person of Barrie Derringer for purposes of “enslavement”, “forms of kidnaping” and forced submission to violations of labor laws, operation of blackmail and subversion, and other matters as to why the “employer” wants this divorce to proceed. Barrie Derringer is under duress, blackmail, intimidation, and subversion with the Maestas employer as “she knows too much” of illegal and likely criminal activities in the arena of “accountant” so as to put her life in possible jeopardy, and Barrie allows her employer to brainwash and intimidate Barrie Derringer wherein she cannot quit, under threats to her that she would be the scapegoat of any investigation of ‘cooking’ the books or duplicate sets of books, and thus force Barrie Derringer to make irrational decisions to submit to the corruption of the employer, and as a way out, possibly divorce her husband to isolate and protect him from the possible devastation, and also a past attempt at “suicide” of killing herself to escape the control and oppression of the employer. In the Fall of 2010, the pressure and abuse of Steve Maestas was so severe that Barrie Derringer came home to tell David that day had been so extreme, Barrie had thought of taking off in the afternoon to come home and commit suicide with use of one of David Derringer抯 firearms, so that David would find her dead in the evening. The “divorce” proceedings are under the control of the employer, and Barrie should retreat back to her own husband Cowboy (Respondent) who not only defends himself but is dedicated in love to protect and defend his Barrie Derringer with his life if needed without reservation. It is easily shown the love and devotion of the Derringers to each other of texting and the E-Mails and birthday card from Barrie Derringer in the Fall of 2011. At no time in the Derringer marriage, was there any discord between the Derringer couple, but only some problems with the living and transportation circumstances. Barrie Derringer was a happy and well contented and wonderful wife, until the fire disaster total mind control invasion by her employer and family after December 27, 2011. In the Fall of 2011 on a Friday night at 6:30 PM 1 ?hours after quitting time, when Barrie finally decided to stop working, the Derringers were still in the parking lot of Maestas and Ward deciding what movie to see on the Derringer 揹ate night? when Barrie received a cell phone call on 搒peaker?with Derringer as a witness. Boss Steve Maestas had left at 3:00PM that day early and did not get a 搑eport?from Barrie over financial secret information, and Barrie had finished the 搑eport?and placed it on his desk before leaving. Apparently, there are 搑eports?that detail financial information that Steve Maestas hides from everyone else, only known by Barrie Derringer. Steve Maestas cussed Barrie, belittled Barrie, defamed Barrie抯 character, forced submission with intimidation and threats until Barrie was crying, groveling and whining in submission to Steve抯 emotional and verbal abuse. It was disgusting to witness your own wife being treated like a 搒treet whore?by an abusive boss enraged as some pimp. The 揹omestic violence?in this matter comes from Barrie抯 employer, not David Derringer.
When the Derringer抯 could not move from the state, in the Fall of 2011, they decided to purchase a 搒hort sale?property to rapidly fix up and gain money for leaving New Mexico. The Derringers had gone through a tough emotional time in December, 2011 with three older pets dying in a period of three days, and then, on December 23, 2011 while the Derringer抯 were moving into the new home in the East Mountains, the home burned down, killing five of the Derringer dogs only two days before Christmas. The emotional devastation was extreme, and the Derringers struggled in the aftermath of the fire to regain balance, with much left to put back together and new plans to be made just to survive. Despite the fire disaster only two days before, Barrie Derringer was forced by her employer to work on Christmas day (Sunday), despite the office of Maestas being closed. On the next day, Monday, also a holiday when no 揳ccountant?of any real estate company was working, Barrie Derringer was forced by bosses Steve Maestas and Debbie Harms to come in for seven hours on December 26, 2011. Clearly, any 搉ormal?boss would have demanded Barrie take time off after such a disaster in her life, rather than force her to work on Christmas and the following day holiday. It is unknown what transpired on that Monday except that Barrie Derringer told her husband that night that boss Debbie Harms invited her to come and live with them 揳lone?without David Derringer, and the next day of December 27, 2011, Barrie Derringer left David Derringer never to return to her husband. After December 27, 2011, when Barrie Derringer was in the corrupt hands and mind control of her employer, her entire personality, attitude, demeanor, and ethics changed into a person that David Derringer had never known. The happy, well contented, centered, smiling Barrie Derringer turned into a frantic, unethical, raging person with no focus on any matter, and little emotion over any issues, including, but not limited to Barrie抯 husband, and the Derringer animals Barrie always had loved unconditionally. David Derringer constantly texted Barrie numerous times each day as always, with 搣I love you?and talking about what Barrie viewed as wrong, the Derringer relationship and marriage and phone messaged and talked on the phone with Barrie numerous times. Barrie herself arranged several meetings with husband Plaintiff alone and in her car, at night, and in the locked storage unit, and plans to go dancing, but was distant and un-connected in thought and motivation. Barrie knew and admitted that David Derringer loved her, and she felt safe and secure in David抯 arms, but would not return home, and was controlled by her bosses in most thoughts. Several times David saw the glimmer of the past Barrie, only to be extinguished by the constant barrage of the control Debbie Harms at their home, where Barrie was temporarily staying and at work, with Barrie抯 bosses having 24 hour mind control over Barrie. On January 12, 2012, David Derringer dressed up in his wedding suit for the Derringer anniversary and bought red roses and an anniversary card to take to Barrie抯 work at Maestas and Ward and invite his wife to lunch to talk. David Derringer was forced from the property with threats by bosses Steve Maestas and Debbie Harms that the APD would be called for criminal trespass if David Derringer did not immediately leave. Debbie Harms prohibited husband David Derringer to have any visual or verbal contact with his own wife. David Derringer could only leave the roses on Barrie抯 desk as he was thrown out of the building. The following phone texts documented by Sprint show the dialogs that day and the next between husband David Derringer to Barrie Derringer under control by Barrie抯 employers.
David Derringer January 12, 2012 11:04 AM “I love you”.
David Derringer January 12, 2012 12:16 PM “Please listen to my voice mail at work. There is a control and nasty influence from Debbie Harms that will ruin your life. I bought you the prettiest dozen red roses I could find, dressed up in my Cowboy wedding suit to deliver your flowers and card. Debbie almost literally threw my out of the building with her obvious next step to call the cops. I said nothing to her. I don’t know if you are staying with them or what if anything you have told her, as nothing is her business and I have never done anything bad to you. They are obviously working your ass off under the circumstances extorting and using you severely without me to say something. You work for some really nasty people that are exploiting you and as your husband ask you to quit Maestas immediately. We can find you another job with decent folk and in the meantime I am working in the settlement for more than you make in a year.”
David Derringer January 12, 2012 2:21 PM “I know your head is really messed up right now, but please give them your immediate resignation. Debbie has no business as your boss meddling in anything of your private life. You obviously are in with a bunch of nasty people as I have tried to get you out of there since I met you. For once please listen and get out of that “Peyton Place”. I love you very much Barrie.”
David Derringer January 12, 2012 2:46 PM “I love you and can’t stand people hurting you and using you so badly in exploitation. Please call the employment agency but quit Debbie now and take all leave and vacation. I can’t even believe what an egotistical bitch she is. Luv U honey. You are obviously listening to and hanging out with the wrong people that are not really your friends. Your best friend, lover, and soul mate is Cowboy. I am the one that really loves you and will do anything to protect you. Debbie is very disturbing.”
David Derringer January 12, 2012 3:13 PM “Now I know what it must be like when a wife or kid gets with the wrong people, drugs and trouble, and all you can do is try to talk and communicate.”
Barrie Derringer January 12, 2012 8:50 PM “Wow , the roses are beautiful!!!! Thank you. I’m sorry for your bad experience today. I am not going to quit my job.”
David Derringer January 12, 2012 8:53 PM “You are not an “employee” there. They think they own you.”
David Derringer January 13, 2012 5:31AM “You say to me that you are sorry for the way your husband was treated by Debbie, but I know you will say nothing to Debbie in defense of your husband and tell her not to ever treat your husband Cowboy badly.”
Barrie Derringer January 13, 2012 6:58AM “Maybe it’s best that you not come by unannounced.”
David Derringer January 13, 2012 8:13AM “Maybe you should realize how WARDEN DEBBIE is treating you.”
David Derringer January 13, 2012 11:23AM “We have the same scenario of David Lee and Rosie with their marriage being ruined by Debbie and Steve now happening to my wife. I remember the cussing abusive phone call of Steve that Friday night in the car when we were to go to the movies that had you in fear and crying. Steve reminds me of your same fear of Charlie “there’ll be hell to pay if I touch these motorcycle parts”. You are afraid of Steve and Debbie in the same way but you still let them do it to you. We need to spend time in person and talk about these things. I need to know if Debbie took your card and photographs and then only told you the flowers were from me.”
David Derringer January 13, 2012 11:27AM “Think about how bad it is for you to feel obligated to have to work Christmas day and the day after when you were off. My God the fear you must have of Steve and Debbie just like Charlie past.”
Barrie Derringer January 13, 2012 12:00 PM “I am not afraid of Debbie or Steve”
David Derringer January 13, 2012 12:34 PM “I was present in the car and watched you cry and be afraid of Steve when he tore you a new asshole. Hell, I was there and listened on the speaker phone. The same thing is happening with David and Rosie. You need to save our marriage just like they do. I love you very much and I want my wife back and your kids want their mom back.”
David Derringer January 13, 2012 12:38 PM “I should have taken the phone that day and made Steve apologize for cussing you out and tearing you a new asshole, but then as usual you would be mad for protecting you instead of mad at the enemy. You are kind of like the Stockholm Syndrome.”
David Derringer January 17, 2012 8:17 PM “When I delivered your flowers did you hear that I was at your office and didn’t want to see me and was it you that asked Debbie to throw me out”
Barrie Derringer January 17, 2012 8:33 PM “No.”
Because of many irrational acts by Barrie in 搑age?over a flat tire, and other acts showing that Barrie was either not taking her medications for hormones, depression, anti-anxiety, and tranquilizers under her doctor抯 supervision, David Derringer locked the Derringer storage on January 20, 2012 to keep Barrie Derringer from the loaded Derringer firearms. Debbie Harms, Irwin Harms and employees of both Sun Vista Ent. and Maestas and Ward and 揻riend of Barrie Derringer?and multiple men attacked and broke into the Derringer locked storage/shop unit at 101 Florida SE Unit C on February 4, 2012 with support of Sun Vista trucks, with intent to illegally take all Barrie Derringer抯 property, all community property without any marital settlement agreement or divorce filing, and to steal as much as possible of David Derringer抯 personal property. David Derringer arrived in passing by in a fluke, and dialed 911 upon seeing the break-in. David Derringer then demanded all persons in attendance get off of his legally leased property and advised all persons that they were in criminal trespass and were illegally taking personal property owned by David Derringer. Wife Barrie Derringer was not seen at that time, apparently somewhere in the storage unit. Debbie Harms, got three inches from David Derringer and started screaming threats at David Derringer and when David Derringer held onto a table to prevent loading, Debbie Harms, 揻riend of Barrie Derringer?and at least 6 of the men in attendance jumped David Derringer and held David Derringer down against his will in criminal assault and battery until they saw the APD starting to arrive due to David抯 911 call and turned David Derringer loose. Upon releasing David Derringer, who reeled from the assault in 搑age?of being held against his will, wife Barrie Derringer walked then directly to her husband and placed both hands upon his face with no fear whatsoever of being hurt in any manner. As stated under oath by Barrie Derringer in the DV-12-234 hearing of February 21, 2012, 揇avid Derringer would NEVER hurt me physically? Debbie Harms had instigated this criminal attack as a way to show her subservient slave Barrie Derringer that 搒he was in charge?of all persons and that she would make David Derringer submit to her force, just as she has done to wife Barrie Derringer. Third parties are involved in the 搣conspiracy?to remove wife Barrie Derringer from the Derringer marriage and force involuntary servitude as a continuing basis against Barrie Derringer抯 logistical will, and continue to enslave David Derringer’s wife with cult mind control and ruin the Derringer marriage. Undoubtedly, other jobs than Maestas and Ward are many, that have ethical owners that leave alone the marriages and personal life of their employees. Divorce should be denied.
WHEREFORE the Respondent David Derringer requests of this court to Order the following:
1) Order all “restraining Orders” of DV-12-234 and DM-12-610 dissolved so that there is free available contact of Barrie Derringer and David Derringer to reconstruct their love and marriage.
2) Order the Petition for Dissolution of Marriage DM-12-610 denied and dismissed with prejudice.
3) Order Barrie Derringer not to file any Petitions for Dissolution or Marriage or Petitions for Legal Separation in this or any other court for a period of one year from the time of the Order.
4) Order counseling for both parties to resolve all marital issues between them for marriage stability and to provide relief for emotional issues regarding the home fire, death of animals and Barrie Derringer emotional blockage of the love of David Derringer and that of the remaining animals.
5) Order that no third parties interfere with the Derringer marriage at any future time.
6) Follow the law to provide time and ability to re-establish the sanctity of the Derringer marriage and available reconciliation of all issues keeping Barrie Derringer and David Derringer apart.
Should this court not dissolve and deny DM-12-610, as proper, the court should order the following:
1) Deny that there is a proven “incompatibility”.
2) Mandate that Barrie Derringer provide all inventory of Barrie Derringer personal property, community property and David Derringer personal property taken on December 27, 2011, January 2, 2012, January 3, 2012, January 8, 2012, February 4, 2012, February 25, 2012 and March 8, 2012.
3) Order a directive for criminal prosecution by APD against Barrie Derringer for perjury, fraud, illegal breaking and entering and other criminal acts in these proceedings.
4) Deny the Petitioner spousal support, but provide husband David Derringer with housing and an income from Barrie Derringer of $1,200.00 per month for a period of two years.
5) Deny the Petitioner any attorney fees or court costs.
6) Restore Barrie Derringer’s name to her maiden name of Barrie Lee Crowe.
7) Order Barrie Derringer provide husband David Derringer with interim $800.00 per month income for food and living expenses, making it retroactive through January, 2012 until the Final Divorce Decree.
8) Order Barrie Derringer to make Chevrolet 2005 truck payments for two years to Wells Fargo Dealer Services.
9) Order a Marital Settlement Agreement be reached before a Final Decree is entered in which all tangible property of any kind is divided in agreement by both parties.
10) Order that all debt be entered into a Marital Settlement Agreement divided as with agreement with both parties, and re-payment to David Derringer of all separate monies spent by David from “inheritance”.
11) Award relief that the court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted by: _______________________________
David Derringer, Box 1205, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE March 20, 2012
Petitioner’s attorney of record
Alain Jackson
423 6th St. NW
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
505-620-6688
On March 20, 2012 I hereby certify that I sent a copy of this pleading to:
The Second Judicial District Court, 400, Lomas NW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
